How to Cite
Downloads
Métricas Alternativas
Dimensions
Abstract
Using the records of the National Database of Scientific Products and the Scienti-Colombia informational platform, a quantitative analysis of the impact of the scientific production by Colombian research groups was done. Of the bibliographic production since 1996 to 2005, recorded from the 1825 recognized Colombian groups, it was possible to identify 30123 scientific articles published. The 19.33% (5825) of scientific papers were published in scientific journals with Impact Factor (IF) as defined by ISI. The 47.7% were in life sciences and health, and 37.4% in biological and physical sciences.
Keywords
References
Arribalzaga, EB. 1995. Inquietudes ante un artículo científico. Rev Argent Cirug. 69: 86-90.
Cho, M., Gastel B, Marusic A, Mandel JS, Marcos A. Publishing in developing countries: problems and solutions. CBE Views, 1999; 22(6): 198.
Colciencias. 2005. Índice para la Medición de Grupos de Investigación Científica, Tecnológica o de Innovación. Subdirección de programas de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico. 2004, 2005, 2006.
Colciencias. 2006. Índice para la medición de Grupos de Investigación, Tecnológica o de Innovación, Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología “Francisco José De Caldas” Colciencias, Mayo de 2006.
Gibbs WW. 1995. Lost science in the third world. Scientific American August:76-83.
García Río, F., Álvarez-Sala Walther R., Gómez de Terre- ros Caro J. & Villamor León J. 1998. Búsqueda bibliográfica e indicadores bibliométricos. En: Manual de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica SEPAR. Edit Ediciones Médicas, Madrid. Vol. 2, 1945-56.
Bador P, Petit O. 1998. Factor impact and indexing in bibliographic databases: comparison of these quality criteria for the assessment of pharmaceutical journals. J Pharm Belg. 53:71-3.
Lehrl S. 1999.The impact factor as an assessment criterion of scientific achievements- the right to equal chances. Strahlenther Onkol.175:141-53.
Valentinuzzi ME. 1997. Evaluación de la producción científica. Rev Médica Tucumán. 3:5-28.
Parthasarathy H. 2005 Measures of Impact. PLoS Biol. 3: e296
Bador P, Petit O. 1998. Factor impact and indexing in bibliographic databases: comparison of these quality criteria for the assessment of pharmaceutical journals. J Pharm Belg. 53:71-3.
Cho, M., Gastel, B., Marusic, A., Mandel, JS., Marcos, A. 1999. Publishing in developing countries: problems and solutions. CBE Views. 22:198.
Coleman, R. 1999. Impact factors: use and abuse in biomedical research. Anat Rec. 257:54-7.
Gallagher EJ, Barnaby DP. 1998. Evidence of methodologic bias in the derivation of the Science Citation Index impact factor. Ann Emerg Med. 31: 83-6.
Gensini GR., Conti AA. 1999.The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production. Ann Ital Med Int. 14:130-5.
Garfield, E. 1999. Journal impact factor: a brief review. Can Med Assoc J. 161:979–80.
Saha S, Sanjay S, Christakis DA. 2003. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of Medical Library Association; 91: 42-4.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0