Geometric uncertainty in non-paraxial interference
PDF

How to Cite

Castañeda, R. (2023). Geometric uncertainty in non-paraxial interference. Revista De La Academia Colombiana De Ciencias Exactas, Físicas Y Naturales, 47(185), 795–806. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1952

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Métricas Alternativas


Dimensions

Abstract

In this article, a novel meaning for the notion of uncertainty is discussed, within the framework of the non-paraxial interference theory based on confinement in geometric states of space. This novel meaning refers to the fact that, for any set of space states whose vertices are distributed in an arbitrary array of size less than λ/10, both the excitation provided by the geometric potential and the positions of the vertices of the states are completely uncertain, such that the complete set is represented by the Lorentzian well of an individual ground state of space, with vertex at any of the points of the array, even if the set is under the maximum prepared non-locality (i.e., under a strong geometric potential). It is shown that the geometric uncertainty is different but compatible with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. In fact, geometrical uncertainty establishes both the upper limit of momentum uncertainty and the lower limit of position uncertainty in the Heisenberg principle.

https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1952

Keywords

Uncertainty | States of space | Geometric potential | Confinement | Spatially structured wells
PDF

References

Ballentine L. (2014). Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, 2nd ed. World Scientific.

Born, M., Wolf, E. (1993). Principles of Optics 6th ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Busch, P., Lahti, P., Werner, R.F. (2013). Proof of Heisenberg’s Error-Disturbance Relation. Physical Review Letters, 111, 160405.

Castañeda, R., Hurtado, C. (2023). Vacuum fluctuations in single photon interference. Submitted to Journal Mod. Opt.

Castañeda, R., Bedoya, P., Hurtado, C. (2023). Quantum formalism of interference as confinement in spatially structured Lorentzian wells. Journal of Physics. A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 56, 045302. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/acb6c6

Castañeda, R., Bedoya, P., Matteucci, G. (2021). Non-locality and geometric potential provide the phenomenology of the double-hole single massive particle and light interference. Physica Sripta, 96, 125036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ac3ea5

Castañeda, R. (2017). Discreteness of the real point emitters as a physical condition for diffraction. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 34, 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.34.000184

Erhart, J., Sponar, S., Sulyok, G., Badurek, G., Ozawa, M., Hasegawa, Y. (2012). Experimental Demonstration of a Universally Valid Error-Disturbance Uncertainty Relation in Spin Measurements. Nature Physics, 8, 185-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphys2194

Feynman, R., Leighton R., Sands, M. (1965). The Feynman Lectures on Physics vol 3. Menlo Park: Addison–Wesley.

Matteucci, G., Ferrari, L., Migliori, A. (2010). The Heisenberg uncertainty principle demonstrated with an electron diffraction experiment. European Journal of Physics, 31, 1287-1293. http://iopscience.iop.org/ 0143-0807/31/5/027

Ozawa, M. (2003). Universally valid reformulation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on noise and disturbance in measurement. Physical Review A, 67, 042105.

Rozema, L.A., Darabi, A., Mahler, D.H., Hayat, A., Soudagar, Y., Steinberg A.M. (2012). Violation of Heisenberg’s Measurement-Disturbance Relationship by Weak Measurements. Physical Review Letters, 109, 100404.

Rozema, L.A., Mahler, D.H., Hayat, A., Steinberg, A.M. (2013). A Note on Different Definitions of Momentum Disturbance. arXiv:1307.3604.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales