Algunos elementos históricos específicos sobre la evolución de la Educación matemática como disciplina de investigación

Bruno D’Amore

doi:10.18257/raccefyn.2571

Vol. 48 No. 186 (2024), Mathematics

Vol. 48 No. 186 (2024)

Some specific historical elements on the evolution of ‘Mathematics Education’ as a research discipline

Mathematics

https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.2571

Published 2024-03-19

Bruno D’Amore⁺⁻

Bruno D’Amore

Accademia delle Scienze di Bologna, classe di Matematica; Doctorado en Educación de la Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogotá, Colombia; Grupo de investigación Nucleo di Ricerca in Didattica della Matematica, Departamento de Matemática, Universidad de Bolonia, Italia

PDF (Español (España))

How to Cite

D’Amore, B. (2024). Some specific historical elements on the evolution of ‘Mathematics Education’ as a research discipline. Revista De La Academia Colombiana De Ciencias Exactas, Físicas Y Naturales, 48(186), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.2571

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Abstract

The discipline “Mathematics Education” is part, in the Italian university world, of the “MAT 04” disciplinary scientific area; courses in this discipline are held in all Italian universities at various academic levels: Faculty of Science, degree courses for the training of primary school teachers, masters and research doctorates. In this conference the international lines of the historical evolution of this discipline are traced, with its antecedents, in an attempt to explain what the current conditions are.

https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.2571

Keywords

Mathematics Education | History of Mathematics Education | Mathematics Educations as Mathematics field | Mathematics Education as scientific theory

PDF (Español (España))

References

Brousseau, G. (1986). Fondements et méthodes de la didactique des mathématiques. Recherches en Didactiques des Mathématiques, 7(2), 33-115.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Towards a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge University Press. Bunge, M. (1960). Science, its method and its philosophy. Eudeba.

D’Amore, B. (2007). Mathematical objects and sense: how semiotic transformations change the sense of mathematical objects. Acta Didactica Universitatis Comenianae, 7, 23-45.

D’Amore, B. & Fandiño-Pinilla, M. (2007). How the sense of mathematical objects changes when their semiotic representations undergo treatment and conversion. La matematica e la sua didattica, 21(1), 87-92. [Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of UMI–SIMAI/SMAI–SMF: Mathematics and its Applications. Panel on Mathematics Education. Department of Mathematics, University of Turin. July 6, 2006].

D’Amore, B. & Fandiño-Pinilla, M. (2017). Reflexiones teóricas sobre las bases del enfoque ontosemiótico de la Didáctica de la Matemática. En J.M. Contreras, P. Arteaga, G.R. Cañadas, M.M. Gea, B. Giacomone y M.M. López–Martín (Eds.), Actas del II Congreso Internacional Virtual sobre el enfoque Ontosemiótico. Granada, March 23-26, 2017. Proem Editora. http://enfoqueontosemiotic.ugr.es/civeos.html

Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica 12 02 1985, n. 104 (D.P.R. 104). (1985). Approvazione dei nuovi programmi didattici per la scuola primaria. p. 24 Gazzetta ufficiale, 76. https://www.edscuola.it/archivio/norme/decreti/dpr104_85.pdf

Dienes, Z. (1972). La mathématique vivante. OCDL.

Fischbein, E. (1963). Conceptele Figurale. Editura Academiei RPR.

Fischbein, E. (1993). The Theory of Figural Concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139-162.

Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. Planetary astronomy in the development of western thought. Harvard University Press.

Kline, M. (1973). Why Johnny Can’t Add: The Failure of the New Math. St. Martin’s Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263657405837820

Lakatos, I. (1978). Philosophical Papers. Cambridge University Press.

Radford, L. (2021). The theory of objectification. A Vygotskian perspective on knowing and becoming in mathematics teaching and learning. Brill/Sense. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1984070

Romberg, T. (1983). Toward “normal science” in some mathematics education research. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 15(8), 89-92.

Stolz, M. (2002). The History of Applied Mathematics and the History of Society. Synthese, 133(1), 43-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1020823608217

Thom, R. (1970). Les mathématiques modernes: une erreur pédagogique et philosophique? L’Age de la Science, 3(3), 225-242.

Thom, R. (1973). Modern mathematics: does it exist? En A. Howson (Ed.), Developments in Mathematical Education (194-210). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139013536.011

Wigner, E. (1960). The unseasonable effectiveness of Mathematics in the Natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160130102