Study of the ultraviolet radiation index in the Central Western area of Mexico, its association with the risk of skin cancer, and a technological proposal for the dissemination of the problem and its prevention
PDF (Español (España))

How to Cite

López-Saldaña G. A., Cendejas-Valdez, J. L., Soto-Sumuano, J. L., & Benítez-Ramírez, M. E. (2024). Study of the ultraviolet radiation index in the Central Western area of Mexico, its association with the risk of skin cancer, and a technological proposal for the dissemination of the problem and its prevention. Revista De La Academia Colombiana De Ciencias Exactas, Físicas Y Naturales, 48(186), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.2190

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Métricas Alternativas


Dimensions

Abstract

In 2012, the World Health Organization (WHO) classified ultraviolet radiation (UVR) as a group 1 carcinogen, which means there is sufficient evidence that it can cause cancer in humans. Here we show the results of our study on UVR in the Central Western zone of Mexico and its association with the risk of skin cancer; besides, we propose a technological solution for the diffusion of this problem with recommendations for its prevention. For this, we measured and classified solar ultraviolet radiation for a year to subsequently investigate and analyze the increase in skin cancer associated with UVR. These were our results: a) we found “very high” levels of ultraviolet radiation according to the UV index, with an annual average of 9.0, and 10.7 in the four months with the highest radiation; b) one out of three cases of melanoma (a type of skin cancer) in Mexico is caused by UVR exposure; c) secondary sources showed an increase in cases of skin melanoma in Mexico, and d) a proposal and the development of an App for the dissemination, prevention, and risk reduction. Our study is aligned with the Objectives of Sustainable Development 3.4 and 3.d set by the United Nations (UN) 2030 Agenda.

https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.2190

Keywords

Ultraviolet Radiation Index (UVI) | Skin cancer | 2030 Agenda | Mobile application | UV rays
PDF (Español (España))

References

American Cancer Society. (2023). Cancer Facts & Figures 2023. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancerorg/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2023/2023-cancer-facts-and-figures.pdf

Arnold, M., de Vries, E., Whiteman, D. C., Jemal, A., Bray, F., Parkin, D. M., Soerjomataram, I. (2018). Global burden of cutaneous melanoma attributable to ultraviolet radiation in 2012. International Journal of Cancer, 143 (6), 1305-1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31527

Aroste, V. (2017). Clasificación de los carcinógenos (IARC) [Imagen]. Material Educativo. https://fullseguridad.net/2017/06/02/listado-agentes-cancerigenos-segun-iarc/

Benavides, H., Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales. (2010) Información técnica sobre la Radiación Ultravioleta, el Índice UV y su pronóstico (IDEAM– METEO/001-2010). Bogotá, D.C.: IDEAM. http://documentacion.ideam.gov.co/openbiblio/bvirtual/022454/NotatecnicaIUVPaginaWEBfinal.pdf

Boyle, P. & Parkin, D. M. (1991). Cancer registration: principles and methods. Statistical methods for registries. IARC Scientific Publications, (95), 126-158. https://publications.iarc.fr/_publications/media/download/3523/ee33be978ff8031c5613f293298ae01d8347bb33.pdf

Chadyšienė, R., Girgždienė, R., Girgždys, A. (2005). Ultraviolet radiation and ground-level ozone variation in Lithuania. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 13(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/16486897.2005.9636843

Cracknell, A. P. & Varotsos, C. (2012). Remote sensing and atmospheric ozone (p. 35). Springer eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10334-6

Crutzen, P. J. (1974). Estimates of possible future ozone reductions from continued use of fluoro-chloro-methanes (CF2 CL2 , CFCL3 ). Geophysical Research Letters, 1(5), 205-208. https://doi.org/10.1029/gl001i005p00205

Dahlback, A. (2002). Recent changes in surface ultraviolet solar radiation and stratospheric ozone at a high Arctic site. UV Radiation and Arctic Ecosystems. Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56075-0_1

de Vries, E., Amador, J. R., Rincón, C., Uribe, C., Parkin, D. M. (2017). Cutaneous melanoma attributable to solar radiation in Cali, Colombia. International Journal of Cancer, 140 (9), 2070-2074. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30638

Delic, N. C., Lyons, J. G., Di Girolamo, N., Halliday, G. M. (2017). Damaging Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Cornea. Photochemistry and photobiology, 93(4), 920-929. https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12686

Duro, E., Campillos, M. T., Causín, S. (2003). El sol y los filtros solares. Medifam, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.4321/s1131-57682003000300005

Gómez, H. (2021). Carga de la enfermedad. J. Rivera, T. Barrientos y C. Oropeza (Eds.). Síntesis sobre políticas de salud. Propuestas basadas en evidencia (203-209). Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. https://www.insp.mx/resources/images/stories/2022/docs/220118_Sintesis_sobre_politicas_de_salud.pdf

Hartmann, D. L. (2015). Global Physical Climatology (2.a Ed., pp. 49-94). Elsevier Science. ISBN: 9780123285317.

He, H., Fioletov, V., Tarasick, D. W., Mathews, T. W., Long, C. S. (2013). Validation of Environment Canada and NOAA UV Index forecasts with Brewer measurements from Canada. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 52(6), 1477-1489. https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-12-0286.1

Hernández, D. A., Aldaco, F., Cervantes, G., Erazo, A. A., Pérez, P., Torrecillas, L., Díaz, G. (2019). La mortalidad por melanoma en México aumenta. Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas, 23 (3), 123-129.

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. (2013). Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, 102(Pt 2), 1-460. https://publications.iarc.fr/_publications/media/download/3143/6464cac7e8eca3fa20f11d4d134613e4870158c5.pdf

International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2012). Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, No. 100D. IARC. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304362/

International Agency for Research on Cancer. (2017). GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence Worldwide in 2012 v1.0. IARC; 2013. https://publications.iarc.fr/Databases/Iarc-Cancerbases/GLOBOCAN-2012-Estimated-Cancer-Incidence-Mortality-And-Prevalence-Worldwide-In-2012-V1.0-2012

Islami, F., Sauer, A. G., Miller, K. D., Fedewa, S. A., Minihan, A. K., Geller, A. C., Lichtenfeld, J. L., Jemal, A. (2020). Cutaneous melanomas attributable to ultraviolet radiation exposure by state. International Journal of Cancer, 147(5), 1385-1390. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32921

Juszczak, A. M., Wölfle, U., Končić, M. Z., Tomczyk, M. (2022). Skin cancer, including related pathways and therapy and the role of luteolin derivatives as potential therapeutics. Medicinal Research Reviews, 42(4), 1423-1462. https://doi.org/10.1002/med.21880

Khotari, C. R. (2004). Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (2.a ed., pp. 2-4). New Age International. Ltd.

Lucas, R., Norval, M., Neale, R. E., Young, A. R., De Gruijl, F. R., Takizawa, Y., Van Der Leun, J. C. (2014). The consequences for human health of stratospheric ozone depletion in association with other environmental factors. Photochemical and Photobiological Sciences, 14 (1), 53-87. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4pp90033b

Mansouri, B., Housewright, C. D. (2017). The Treatment of Actinic Keratoses—The rule rather than the exception. JAMA Dermatology, 153(11), 1200. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3395

Molina, M. J. & Rowland, F. S. (1974). Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom-catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature, 249(5460), 810-812. https://doi.org/10.1038/249810a0

Olsen, C. M., Wilson, L. F., Green, A. C., Bain, C., Fritschi, L., Neale, R. E., Whiteman, D. C. (2015). Cancers in Australia attributable to exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation and prevented by regular sunscreen use. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 39 (5), 471-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12470

Organización Internacional de Normalización. (1999). Erythema reference action spectrum and standard erythema dose (ISO 17166:1999). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/es/#iso:std:iso:17166:ed-1:v2:en

Parkin, D. M., Mesher, D., Sasieni, P. (2011). 13. Cancers attributable to solar (ultraviolet) radiation exposure in the UK in 2010. British Journal of Cancer, 105(S2), S66-S69. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2011.486

Peixoto, J. & Oort, A. (1992). Physics of climate. American Institute of Physics. https://link.springer.com/book/9780883187128

Porta, M. (2008). A Dictionary of Epidemiology. Revista Española De Salud Pública, 82(4). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1135-57272008000400008

Robinson, P. J. & Henderson-Sellers, A. (2014). Contemporary climatology (2.a ed., p.18). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842660.

Rogers, H. W., Weinstock, M. A., Feldman, S. R., Coldiron, B. M. (2015). Incidence Estimate of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer (Keratinocyte Carcinomas) in the U.S. Population, 2012. JAMA dermatology, 151(10), 1081-1086. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1187

Secretaría de Salud. (2015). Cáncer de piel duplica su incidencia cada 10 años. gob.mx. https://www.gob.mx/salud/prensa/cancer-de-piel-duplica-su-incidencia-cada-10-anos

Solomon, S. (1999). Stratospheric Ozone Depletion: A review of Concepts and history. Reviews of Geophysics, 37(3), 275-316. https://doi.org/10.1029/1999rg900008

World Health Organization, United Nations Environment Programme & International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. (2002). Índice UV Solar mundial: Guía práctica. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42633

World Health Organization. (2020). Cancer Mexico 2020 country profile. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/cancer-mex-2020

World Meteorological Organization. (2022). Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022 (Número de informe 278). https://csl.noaa.gov/assessments/ozone/2022/downloads/executivesummary.pdf

Yuan, K., Guarnaccia, C. A., Hayslip, B. (2003). A study of the distribution of sample coefficient Alpha with the Hopkins symptom checklist: Bootstrap versus Asymptotics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(1), 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164402239314

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales