How to Cite
Downloads
Métricas Alternativas
Dimensions
Abstract
The present study was conducted in north Tolima to characterize the butterflies associated with fragments of forest, brushwood/stubbles and grass. The geographical coordinates of the edges of every habitat in a smallholding of 0.6 km of radius were registered with the aim of finding the correlations between landscape attributes and the butterfly community represented by 266 species distributed in six families. Structural differences between the habitats can help explain the differences in the richness and diversity of butterflies because the communities respond differently to the habitatReferences
Álvarez, J. (1993). Inventario de las mariposas (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) con anotaciones ecológicas para dos zonas de departamento de Risaralda, Colombia. Trabajo de grado (Biología). Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional, Bogotá. 204 p.
Andrade-C, M.G. (1990). Clave para las familias y subfamilias de Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera de Colombia. Caldasia. 16 (79): 359-550.
Andrade-C, M.G. (1995). Monografías de fauna en Colombia 1. Nymphalidae: Acraeinae: Actinote. (Monografía No. 1). Instituto de Ciencias Naturales. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, 120 p.
Andrade-C., M.G. (2002). Biodiversidad de las mariposas (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) de Colombia. En: Costa, C., Vanin, S. A., Lobo, J. M., Melic, A. (editores.). Proyecto de Red Iberoamericana de Biogeografía y Entomología Sistemática - PriBES II. Monografías Tercer Milenio. Zaragoza: SEA. 2: 153-172.
Andrade-C., M.G. (2011). Estado del conocimiento de la biodiversidad en Colombia y sus amenazas. Consideraciones para fortalecer la interacción ambiente-política. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. 35 (137): 491-507.
Andrade-C., M.G., Campos-Salazar, L.R., González-Montaña, L.A., Pulido-B., H.W. (2007). Santa María, mariposas, alas y color. Serie de Guías de campo del Instituto de Ciencias Naturales No. 2. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá D. C., Colombia. 248 p.
Andrade-C., M.G., Henao-Bañol, E.R., Triviño, P. (2013). Técnicas y procesamiento para la recolección, preservación y montaje de mariposas en estudios de biodiversidad y conservación (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea – Papilionoidea). Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. 37 (144): 311-325.
Bastidas, A., Rivadeneira, P., Castillo, G. (2002). Variación de la diversidad de Lepidoptera Rhopalocera según gradientes altitudinales en el santuario de flora y fauna Galera (NariñoColombia). Resumen. XXXVII Congreso Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas. p. 241.
Baz, A. & García-Boyero, A. (1995). The effects of forest fragmentation on butterfly communities in central Spain. Journal of Biogeography. 22: 129-140.
Birket, S.J. (1959). Genital preparations of male Lepidoptera. Entomologiske Meddeleser. 29: 170-178.
Blackburn, T.M. & Gaston, K.J. (1996). Spatial patterns in the geographic range sizes of bird species in the New World. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 351: 897-912.
Blue Marble Geographics. (1992-1994). The Geographic Calculator – version 3.09.
Brosi, B.J., Shih, T.M., Billadello, L.N. (2008). Polinización biótica y cambios en el uso de la tierra en paisajes dominados por humanos. In C. Harvey & J. C. Sáenz (editores). Evaluación y conservación de biodiversidad en paisajes fragmentados de Mesoamérica. Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica: Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad- Bio. p. 105-135.
Brown, K.S. (1991). The conservation of neotropical environments: Insects as indicator. In: The conservation of insects and their habits. Collins, N.M y J.A. Thomas, editors. Academic Press. p. 449 - 504.
Collinge, S.K., Prudic, K.L., Oliver, J.C. (2003). Effects of local habitat characteristics and landscape context on grassland butterfly diversity. Conservation Biology. 17 (1): 178-187.
Colwell, R.K. & Hurtt, G.C. (1994). Nonbiological gradients in species richness and spurious Rapoport effect. American Naturalist. 144: 570-595.
Constantino, L.M. (1995). Revisión de la tribu Haeterini Herrich – Schaeffer, 1864 en Colombia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Satyrinae). SHILAP Revista Lepidopterológica. 23 (89): 49-76.
Connor, E.F., Courtney, A.C., Yoder, J. M. (2000). Individualsarea relationships: The relationship between animal population density and area. Ecology. 81: 734-748.
D’Abrera, B. (1981). Butterflies of the Neotropical Region. Part I. Papilionidae and Pieridae. Melbourne, Australia: Landsdowne Editions. XVI + 172 p.
D’Abrera, B. (1984). Butterflies of the neotropical region. Part II. Danaidae, Ithomiidae, Heliconidae & Morphidae. Melbourne, Australia: Hill House Publishers. XII + 173-384 p.
D’Abrera, B. (1987a). Butterflies of the neotropical region. Part III. Brassolidae, Acraeidae, Nymphalidae (partim). Melbourne, Australia: Hill House Publishers. VIII + 385-525 p.
D’Abrera, B. (1987b). Butterflies of the neotropical region. Part IV. Nymphalidae (partim). Melbourne, Australia: Hill House Publishers. XIV + 527-678 p.
D’Abrera, B. (1988). Butterflies of the neotropical region. Part V. Nymphalidae (Conc.) and Satyridae. Melbourne, Australia: Hill House Publishers. VIII + 679-877 p.
D’Abrera, B. (1994). Butterflies of the neotropical region. Part VI. Riodinidae. Melbourne, Australia: Hill House Publishers. VII + 879-1096 p.
D’Abrera, B. (1995). Butterflies of the neotropical region. Part VII. Lycaenidae. Melbourne, Australia: Hill House Publishers. XI + 1098-1270 p.
De La Maza, R.R. (1987). Mariposas mexicanas. México: Fondo de cultura Económica. 301 p.
Dennis, R., Shreeve, T.G., Sheppard, D A. (2007). Species conservation and landscape management: A habitat perspective. In A. Stewart, T. R. New, O. Lewis (editors). Insect Conservation Biology. CABI. p. 92-126.
DeVries, P.J. (1987). Butterflies of Costa Rica and their natural history: Papilionidae, Pieridae, Nymphalidae. New Jersey: rinceton. Vol. 1. 329 p.
DeVries, P.J., Murray, D., Lande, R. (1997). Species diversity in vertical, horizontal, and temporal dimensions of a fruitfeeding butterfly community in an Ecuadorian rainforest. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 62: 343-364.
DeVries, P.J., Walla, T., Greeney, H. (1999). Species diversity in spatial and temporal dimensions of fruit-feeding butterflies from two Ecuadorian rainforests. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 68: 333-353.
Didham, R.K., Lawton, J.H., Hammond, P.M., Eggleton, P. (1998). Trophic structure stability and extinction dynamics of beetles (Coleoptera) in tropical forest fragments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences. 353: 437-451.
Ekroos, J. & Kuussaari, M. (2012). Landscape context affects the relationship between local and landscape species richness of butterflies in semi-natural habitats. Ecography. 35: 232-238.
Erelli, M.C., Ayres, M.P., Eaton, G.K. (1998). Altitudinal patterns in host suitability for forest insects. Oecology. 117: 133-142.
Etter, A. (1993). Ecosystem diversity in Colombia. In: Our Biological Diversity, CEREC and A. Angel Foundation (editors). Bogotá. p. 43-61.
Etter, A. & van Wyngaarden, W. (2000). Patterns of landscape transformation in Colombia, with emphasis in the Andean region. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Ambio. 29 (7): 432-439.
Evans, W.H. (1951). A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part I. Introduction and Group A Pyrrhopyginae. London, British Museum (Natural History). 92 p.
Evans, W.H. (1952). A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part II. Pyrginae. Section I. London, British Museum (Natural History). 178 p.
Evans, W.H. (1953). A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part III. Pyrginae. Section 2. London, British Museum (Natural History). 246 p.
Evans, W.H. (1955). A catalogue of the American Hesperiidae indicating the classification and nomenclature adopted in the British Museum (Natural History). Part IV. Hesperiinae and Megathyminae. London, British Museum (Natural History). 499 p.
Fagua, G. (1999). Variación de las mariposas y hormigas de un gradiente altitudinal de la cordillera Oriental (Colombia). Revista Insectos de Colombia. 2: 318-363.
Fagua, G. (2001). Mariposas diurnas (Lepidoptera). Manual de metodologías para el desarrollo de inventarios y monitoreo de la biodiversidad. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt. Grupo de Exploración y Monitoreo ambiental - GEMA. p. 59 – 76.
Fleishman, E., Austin, E., Weiss, A.D. (1998). An empirical test of Rapoport’s rule: Elevational gradients in montane butterfly communities. Ecology. 79 (7): 2482-2493.
Fox, M. & Real, H.G. (1971). A Monograph of the Ithomiidae (Lepidoptera). Part IV. The tribe Napeogenini Fox. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute. 15: 368.
García-Pérez, J.F. & Ospina-López, L.A. (2004). Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera: diversidad y distribución en la cuenca del río Coello. Ibagué. Tesis de grado. Programa de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Tolima. 485 p.
García-Pérez, J.F., Ospina-López, L.A., Villa, F.A., Reinoso, G. (2007). Diversidad y distribución de mariposas Satyrinae (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) en la cuenca del río Coello, Colombia. Revista de Biología Tropical. 55: 645-653.
García-Robledo, C., Constantino, L.M., Dolores, M., Kattan, G. (2002). Mariposas comunes de la cordillera Central de Colombia. Programa de Colombia de Wildlife Conservation Society. Cali: Feriva, S.A. 130 p.
Gascon, C., Lovejoy, T.E., Bierregaard, R.O., Malcolm, J.R., Stou, P.C., Vasconcelos, H.L., Laurance, W.F. (1999). Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biological Conservation. 91: 223-229.
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A., Ryan, P.D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis. Paleontología Electrónica. 4 (1): 1-9.
Harvey, C.A., Guindon, C.F., Haber, W.A., Hamilton-Derosier, D., Murray, K.G. (2000). The importance of forest patches isolated trees and agricultural windbreaks for local and regional biodiversity: The case of Monteverde. Costa Rica. In: XXI IUFRO World Congress 7-12 August 2000.
Kuala Lumpur. Malasya. Subplenary Sessions. Vol I. XXI IUFRO World Congress. International Union of Research Organization. Kuala Lumpur, Malasya. p. 787-798.
Harvey, C.A., Medina, A., Merlo-Sánchez, D., Vílchez, S., Hernández, B., Sáenz, J.C., Maes, J.M., Casanoves, F., Sinclair, F.L. (2006). Patterns of animal diversity in different forms of tree cover in agricultural andscapes. Ecological Applications. 16: 261-289.
Hill, J.K., Hamer, K.C., Dawood, M.M., Tangah, J., Dawood, D. (2001). Ecology of tropical butterflies in rainforest gaps. Oecologia. 128: 294-302.
Horner-Devine, M.C., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R. (2003). Countryside biogeography of tropical butterflies. Conservation Biology. 17 (1): 168-177.
Jeanneret, P.H., Schüpbach, B., Luka, H. (2003). Quantifying the impact of landscape and habitat features on biodiversity in cultivated andscapes. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment. 98: 311-320.
Kattan, G. (2002). Fragmentación: patrones y mecanismos de extinción de especies. En M. R. Guariguata & G. Kattan (editores). Ecología y Conservación de Bosques Neotropicales. Cartago, Costa Rica: Libro Universitario Regional. p. 561-590.
Krauss, J., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T. (2003). How does landscape context contribute to effects of habitat fragmentation on diversity and population density of butterflies? Journal of Biogeography. 30: 889-900.
Kremen, C. (1992). Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural areas monitoring. Ecological Applications. 2 (2): 203-217.
Kremen, C., Colwell, R.K., Erwin, T.L., Murphy, D.D., Noss, R.F., Sanjayan, M.A. (1993). Terrestrial arthropod assemblages: Their use in conservation planning. Conservation Biology. 7 (4): 796-808.
Krues, A. & Tscharntke, T. (2002). Grazing intensity and the diversity of grasshoppers, butterflies and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conservation Biology. 16 (6): 1570-1580.
Kuussaari, M., Bommarco, R., Heikkinen, R.K., Helm, A., Krauss, J., Linborg, R. (2009). Extinction debt: A challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 24: 564-571.
Lamas, G. (2003). Estado actual del conocimiento de la sistemática de los lepidópteros, con especial referencia a la región Neotropical. Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa. No. 32.
Lamas, G. (2004). Atlas of Neotropical Lepidoptera. Checklis: Part 4: Hesperioidae-Papilionoidea. Florida (USA): Association for Tropical Lepidoptera. 439 p.
Lande, R. (1996). Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos. 76: 5-13.
Le Crom, J.F., Constantino, L.M., Salazar, J.A. (2002). Mariposas de Colombia. Tomo I: Papilionidae. Bogotá: Carlec Ltda. 119 p.
Le Crom, J.F., Llorente, J., Constantino, L.M., Salazar, J.A. (2004). Mariposas de Colombia. Tomo II: Pieridae. Carlec Ltda., Bogotá. 133 p.
Magurran, A.E. (1988). Ecological diversity and its measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Magurran, A.E. (2004). Measuring biological diversity. USA: Blackwell Publishing. Vol VIII. 256 p.
Matter, S.F. (2000). The importance of the relationship between population density and habitat area. Oikos. 89: 613-619.
McGarigal, K. & Marks, B.J. (1994). FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Corvallis, Oregon. 134 p.
McGarigal, K., Cushman, S.A., Neel, M.C., Ene, E. (2002). FRAGSTATS v3: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Categorical Maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
Moreno, C.E. (2001). Métodos para medir la biodiversidad. M&TManuales y Tesis. Zaragoza: SEA. Vol. 1., 84 p.
Murcia, C. (1995). Edge effects in fragmented forests: Implications
for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 10: 58-62.
Murdoch, W.W., Evans, F.C., Peterson, C.H. (1972). Diversity and pattern in plants and insects. Ecology. 53: 819-829.
Neild, A.F.E. (1996). The butterflies of Venezuela, Part 1: Nymphalidae I (Limenitidinae, Apaturinae, Charaxinae). London: Meridian Publications. 144 p.
Odum, E. (1971). Fundamentals of Ecology. W. B. Saunders Company. p. 574.
Ospina-López, L. A., García-Pérez, J.F., Villa, F., Reinoso, G. (2010). Mariposas Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea) de la cuenca del rio Coello, Tolima, Colombia. Actualidades Biológicas. 32 (93): 173-188.
Peña-Cerpa, J.M. (2007). Diversidad y distribución de mariposas diurnas (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) en la cuenca del río Prado. Tesis de grado. Programa de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Básicas, Universidad del Tolima, Ibagué. 180 p.
Pérez-García, O. (2008). Evaluación de la biodiversidad de mariposas diurnas presentes en sistemas agroforestales modernos con café en el Corredor Biológico Volcánica Central-Talamanca, Costa Rica. Tesis Magister Scientiae; Escuela de posgrado; Centro Agronómico Tropical de
Investigación y Enseñanza. Turrialba, Costa Rica. 80 p.
Pollard, E. & Yates, T.J. (1993). Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Londres: Chapman y Hall. 277 p.
Reinoso, G., Villa, F., Esquivel, H.E., García-Melo, J.E., Vejarano-Delgado, M.A. (2007). Biodiversidad faunística y florística de la cuenca del río Totare – Biodiversidad regional Fase III. Informe Técnico. Cortolima – Universidad del Tolima. 1.231 p.
Reinoso, G., Villa, F., Esquivel, H.E., García-Melo, J.E., Vejarano-Delgado, M.A. (2008a). Biodiversidad faunística y florística de la cuenca del río Saldañasubcuenca Anamichú – Biodiversidad regional Fase IV. Informe Técnico. Cortolima – Universidad del Tolima. 943 p.
Reinoso, G., Villa, F., Esquivel, H.E., García-Melo, J.E., Vejarano-Delgado, M.A. (2008b). Biodiversidad faunística y florística de la cuenca del río Lagunillas – Biodiversidad regional Fase IV. Informe Técnico. Cortolima – Universidad del Tolima. 965 p.
Rempel, R.S., Kaukinen, D., Carr, A.P. (2012). Patch Analyst and Patch Grid. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, Ontario. Ricketts, T.H., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., Fay, J.P. (2001).
Countryside biogeography of moths in a fragmented landscape: Biodiversity in native and agricultural habitats. Conservation Biology. 15 (2): 378-388.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995). Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge, UK: Cambrige University Press. 460 p.
Sanders, N.J. (2002). Elevational gradients in ant species richness:
Area, geometry and Rapoport’s rule. Ecography. 25: 25-35.
Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R.J., Margules, C.R. (1991). Biological Consequences of Ecosystem Fragmentation: A Review. Conservation Biology. 5 (1): 18-32.
Schulze, C.H., Waltert, M., Kessler, P.J., Pitopang, R, Shahabuddin, Veddeler, D., Mühlenberg, M., SteffanDewenter, I., Gradstein, S.R., Tscharntke, T. (2004). Biodiversity indicator taxa of tropical land-use systems: Comparing plants, birds and insects. Ecological Application.
(5): 1321-1333.
Seitz, A. (1924). The macrolepidoptera of the world. Alfred Kernen Verlag Stuttgart. Vol. V. 1139 p.
Simonson, S.E., Opler, P.A., Stohlgren, T.J., Chong, G.W. (2001). Rapid assessment of butterfly diversity in a montane landscape. Biodiversity Conservation. 10: 1369-1386.
Sokal, R. & Rohlf, J. (1995). Biometry. The principles and practice of statistics in biological research. 3rd Ed. W. H. New York: Freeman and Company. 850 p.
Solarte-Cabrera, V.M. (2005). Diversidad y estructura espaciotemporal de la comunidad de mariposas diurnas en la Reserva Natural Río Ñambí. San Juan de Pasto. Trabajo de grado. Programa de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Universidad de Nariño. p. 102.
Southwood, T.R., Brown, V.K., Reader, P.M. (1979). The relationship of plant and insect diversities in succession. Zoological Journal of Linnean Society. 12: 327-348.
Statsoft, I. (2007). STATISTICA (data analysis software system). www.statsoft.com Steffan-Dewenter, I. & Tscharntke, T. (2000). Butterfly
community structure in fragmented habitats. Ecology Letters. 3: 449- 56.
Stevens, G.C. (1992). The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: An extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. American Naturalist. 140: 893-911.
Tobar-López, D., Muhammad, I., Casasola, F. (2007). Diversidad de mariposas en un paisaje agropecuario en la región Pacifico Central, Costa Rica. Agroforestería de las Americas. 47: 58-65.
Tyler, H., Brown, K., Wilson, K. (1994). Swallowtail Butterflies of the Americas. A study in biological dynamics, ecological diversity, biosystematics and conservation. Gainesville, US: Scientific Publishers Inc. 376 p.
Vargas, R., Rojas, A.M., Huertas, F.A., Fernández, D.L., Murillo, M.H., Dávila, Y.P., Valderrama, S. (2007). Plan General de Ordenación Forestal para el Departamento del Tolima, Tomo II. Ibagué, Colombia: Universidad del Tolima. 403 p.
Villa, F., Reinoso, G., Bernal, M.H., Losada, S. (2004). Biodiversidad faunística de la cuenca del río Coello – Biodiversidad regional Fase I. Informe Técnico. Cortolima – Universidad del Tolima. 1132 p.
Villa, F., Reinoso, G., Losada, S., Bernal, M.E., Esquivel, H.E., García-Melo, J.E., Vejarano-Delgado, M.A. (2005a). Biodiversidad faunística y florística de la cuenca del río Prado-Biodiversidad regional Fase II. Informe Técnico. Cortolima – Universidad del Tolima. 1308 p.
Villa, F., Reinoso, G., Losada, S., García-Melo, J.E., VejaranoDelgado,
M.A. (2005b). Biodiversidad faunística y florística de la cuenca del río Amoyá – Biodiversidad regional Fase II. Informe Técnico. Cortolima – Universidad del Tolima. 823 p.
Vu, L. (2009). Diversity and similarity of butterfly communities in five different habitat types at Tam Dao National Park, Vietnam. Journal of Zoology. 277 (1): 15-22.
Warren, A.D., Davis, K.J., Stangeland, E.M., Pelham,J.P., Grishin, N.V. (2013). Illustrated Lists of American Butterflies. [30-XII-2013]. < http://www.butterfliesofamerica.com/ >
Wettstein, W. & Schmid, B. (1999). Conservation of arthropod diversity in montane wetlands: Effect of altitude, habitat quality and habitat fragmentation on butterflies and grasshoppers. Journal of Applied Ecology. 36: 363-373.
Willmott, K. (2003). The genus Adelpha: Its systematics, biology, and biogeography. Gainesville, USA: Scientific Publishers. 322 p.
Willmott, K. & Mallet, J. (2004). Correlations between adult mimicry and larval host plants in Ithomiine butterflies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 271 (Suppl.): 266-269.
Zschokke, S., Dolt, C., Rusterholz, H., Oggier, P., Braschler, B., hommen, G.H., Lüdin, E., Erhardt, A., Baur, B. (2000). Short-term responses of plants and invertebrates to experimental small-scale grassland fragmentation. Oecologia. 125: 559-572.
Declaration of originality and transfer author's rights
The authors declare:
- The published data and reference materials have been duly identified with their respective credits and have been included in the bibliographic notes and citations that have been so identified and that should it be required, I have all releases and permissions from any copyrighted material.
- All material presented is free from any copyright and that I accept full legal responsibility for any legal claims relating to copyrighted intellectual property, fully exonerating from responsibility the Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales.
- This work is unpublished and will not be sent to any other journal while waiting for the editorial decision of this journal. I declare that there is no conflict of interest in this manuscript.
- In case of publication of this article, all author´s rights are transferred to the Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, and so cannot be reproduced in any form without the express permission of it.
- By means of this document, if the article is accepted for publication by the Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, the Revista assumes the right to edit and publish the articles in national and international indices or data bases for academic and scientific use in paper, electronic, CD-ROM, internet form either of the complete text or any other known form known or to be known and non-commercial, respecting the rights of the authors.
Transfer of author rights
In case the article is approved for publication, the main author in representation of himself and his co-authors or the main author and his co-authors must cede the author rights of the corresponding article to the Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales, except in the following cases:
The authors and co-authors will retain the right to revise, adapt, prepare derived works, oral presentations, and distribution to some colleagues of reprints of their own published work, if the corresponding credit is given to the Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. It is also permissible to publish the title of the work, summary, tables, and figures of the work in the corresponding web sites of the authors or their employers, also giving credit to the Revista.
If the work has been realized under contract, the author’s employer has the right to revise, adapt, prepare derivative works, reproduce, or distribute in hard copy the published work, in a secure manner and for the exclusive use of his employees.
If the Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales were approached for permission by a third party for using, printing, or publishing specifically articles already published, the Revista must obtain the express permission of the author and co-authors of the work or of the employer except for use in classrooms, libraries, or reprinted in a collective work. The Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales reserves the possible use in its front cover of figures submitted with the manuscripts.
No other right, other than the author’s right, can be claimed by the Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales.