La evolución, la percepción y los mecanismos cerebrales implicados en el atractivo facial: un análisis desde la Psicología Evolucionista
PDF

Cómo citar

Zambrano, D. (2023). La evolución, la percepción y los mecanismos cerebrales implicados en el atractivo facial: un análisis desde la Psicología Evolucionista. Revista De La Academia Colombiana De Ciencias Exactas, Físicas Y Naturales, 47(182), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1866

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas Alternativas


Dimensions

Resumen

Tradicionalmente, las teorías sociales han explicado el atractivo facial como una característica cultural aprendida a través de los procesos de socialización. Sin embargo, la Psicología Evolucionista ha propuesto que hay rasgos del atractivo físico que son universales y que han sido influenciados por la selección natural y sexual, ya que indican la calidad reproductiva y de salud de quien los posee. La investigación en torno a las características faciales y sus implicaciones sociales es amplia. Este texto tiene como objetivo resumir tales esfuerzos desde una perspectiva evolucionista y explorar sus implicaciones sociales. Además, se brinda una síntesis de la evolución facial, se examinan los mecanismos cerebrales implicados en la percepción del atractivo facial y se discuten las teorías de la Psicología Evolucionista sobre los rasgos que hacen a una persona atractiva y por qué. Por último, el texto concluye con una serie de predicciones sobre futuros estudios del atractivo facial y comparte una serie de bases de rostros que pueden ser utilizadas para la investigación y el desarrollo de tesis tanto de pregrado como de posgrado.

https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1866

Palabras clave

Atractivo físico | Atractivo facial | Psicología evolucionista | Simetría facial | Dimorfismo sexual | Cara promedio
PDF

Citas

Aharon, I., Etcoff, N., Ariely, D., Chabris, C.F., O’Connor E., Breiter, H.C. (2001). Beautiful faces have variable reward value: FMRI and behavioral evidence. Neuron, 32, 537-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00491-3

Anand, S., Harish, S. (2015). Sexual dimorphism of human skull by different parameters. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(8), 615-617.

Ardila, R. (2021). Psicología evolucionista. Tomando en serio a Darwin. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Física y Naturales, 45(177), 980-988. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1470

Apicella, C.L., Little, A.C., Marlowe, F.W. (2007). Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers. Perception, 36, 1813. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5601

Aylward, E.H., Park, J.K., Field, K.M., Parsons, A.C., Richards, T.L., Cramer, S.C., Meltzoff, N. (2005). Brain activation during face perception: Evidence of a developmental change. Journal

of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929053124884 Balenger, S.L., Zuk, M. (2014). Testing the Hamilton-Zuk Hypothesis: Past, present, and future.

Integrative and Comparative Biology, 54(4), 601-613. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icu059

Baudouin, J.Y., Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117, 313-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.07.002

Beier, J.S., Spelke, E. S. (2012). Infants’ developing understanding of social gaze. Child Development, 83(2), 486-496. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-8624.2011.01702.x

Boothroyd, L.G., Scott, I., Gray, A.W., Coombes, C.I., Pound, N. (2013). Male facial masculinity as a cue to health outcomes. Evolutionary Psychology, 11(5), 1044-1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100508

Borras-Guevara, M.L., Batres, C., Perrett, D.I. (2017). Aggressor or protector? Experiences and perceptions of violence predict preferences for masculinity. Evolution & Human Behavior, 38, 481-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.03.004

Briñol, P., De la Corte, L., Becerra, A. (2001). ¿Qué es Persuasión? Biblioteca Nueva. Brown, E., Perrett, D.I. (1993). What gives a face its gender? Perception, 22, 829-840. https://doi.org/10.1068/p220829

Bruce, V., Burton, A.M., Hanna, E., Healy, P., Mason, O., Coombes, A., Fright, R., Linney, A. (1993). Sex discrimination: how do we tell the difference between male and female faces? Perception, 22, 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1068/p220131

Burriss, R.P., Roberts, S.C., Welling, L.L.M., Puts, D.A., Little, A.C. (2011). Heterosexual romantic couples mate assortatively for facial symmetry, but not masculinity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(5), 601-613. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211399584

Buss, D.M. (2016). The evolution of desire. Strategies of human mating. Basic Books. Campbell, R., Benson, P.J., Wallace, S.B., Doesbergh, S., Coleman, M. (1999). More about brows: How poses that change brow position affect perceptions of gender. Perception, 28, 489-504. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2784

Cellerino, A. (2002). Facial attractiveness and species recognition: An elementary deduction? Ethology, Ecology & Evolution, 14, 227-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2002.9522742.

Cellerino, A., Borghetti, D., Sartucci, F. (2004). Sex differences in face gender recognition in humans. Brain Research Bulletin, 63, 443-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.03.010

Chen, J.M., Norman, J.B., Nam, Y. (2021). Broadening the stimulus set: Introducing the American multiracial faces database. Behavior Research Methods, 53(1), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01447-8

Cobey, K.D., Little, A.C., Roberts, S.C. (2015). Hormonal effects on women’s facial masculinity preferences: The influence of pregnancy, post-partum, and hormonal contraceptive use. Biological Psychology, 104, 35-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.002

Darwin, C.R. (1872). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. John Murray. DeBruine, L.M. (2018). DeBruine/webmorph: Beta release 2 (v0.0.0.9001). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1162670

DeBruine, L.M., Jones, B.C., Smith, F.G., Little, A.C. (2010). Are attractive men’s faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 751-758. https://doi.

org/10.1037/a0016457

DeBruine, L., Jones, B. (2017a). Face Research Lab London Set (Version 5). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.5047666.v5

DeBruine, L., Jones, B. (2017b). Young Adult White Faces with Manipulated Versions (Version 1). figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4220517.v1

Dion, K., Berscheid, E., Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0033731

Eagly, A.H., Ashmore, R.D., Makhijani, M.G., Longo, L.C. (1991). What is beautiful is good, but: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychological Bulletin, 110(1), 109-128. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.109

Ebner, N., Riediger, M., Lindenberger, U. (2010). FACES - A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 351-362. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.1.351

Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed: Recognizing faces and feelings to improve communication and emotional life. Times Books. Fink, B., Neave, N., Manning, J.T., Grammer, K. (2005). Facial symmetry and the “big-five” personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 523-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.02.002

Fischer, H., Sandblom, J., Herlitz, A., Fransson, P., Wright, C.I., Bäckman, L. (2004). Sexdifferential brain activation during exposure to female and male faces. NeuroReport, 15(2), 235-238. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200402090-00004

Frischen, A., Bayliss, A.P., Tipper, S.P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychology Bulletin, 133(4), 694–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694

Galton, F. (1879). Composite portraits, made by combining those of many different persons into a single resultant figure. Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 8, 132-144. https://doi.org/10.2307/2841021

Gangestad, S.W. (2000). Human sexual selection, good genes, and special design. In D. LeCroy & P. Moller (Eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human reproductive behavior (pp. 50-61). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb06615.x

Garver-Apgar, C.E., Gangestad, S.W., Thornhill, R. (2008). Hormonal correlates of women’s mid-cycle preference for the scent of symmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.007

Guéguen, N. (2012). Does red lipstick really attract men? An evaluation in a bar. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(2), 206-209. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v4n2p206

Hamermesh, DS., Abrevaya, J. (2013). Beauty is the promise of happiness? European Economic Review, 64, 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2013.09.005

Harugop, A.S., Mudhol, R.S., Hajare, P.S., Nargund, A.I., Metgudmath, V.V., Chakrabarti, S. (2012). Prevalence of nasal septal deviation in new-borns and its precipitating factors: A cross-sectional study. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, 64(3), 248-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-011-0247-1

Havlicek, J., Roberts, S.C. (2009). MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 497-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2008.10.007

Horn, G. (1985). Imprinting and the neural basis of memory. In: Will, B., Schmitt, P. & Dalrymple-Alford, J. C. (Eds.). Brain plasticity, learning and memory. (pp. 13–19.). Plenum.

Ishai, A. (2007). Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 63, 181-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.010

Jasienska, G., Lipson, S.F., Ellison, P.T., Thune, I., Ziomkiewicz, A. (2006). Symmetrical women have higher potential fertility. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 390-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.01.001

Johnson, M.H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 766–774. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1766

Johnson, M. (2012). Face perception: a developmental perspective. In G. Rhodes, A. Calder, M. Johnson & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), Oxford handbook of face perception. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.013.0001

Johnson, M.H., Morton, J. (1991). Biology and cognitive development: The case of face recognition. Blackwell.

Johnson, M.H., Senju, A., Tomalski, P. (2015). The two-process theory of face processing: Modifications based on two decades of data from infants and adults. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 50, 169-179. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.009

Jones, B.C., DeBruine, L.M., Little, A.C. (2007). The role of symmetry in attraction to average faces. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(8), 1273-1277. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03192944

Jones, B.C., Fincher, C.L., Welling, L.L.M., Little, A.C., Feinberg, D.R., Watkins, C.D, Al-Dujaili, E.A.S. DeBruine, L.M. (2013). Salivary cortisol and pathogen disgust predict men’s preferences for feminine shape cues in women’s faces. Biological Psychology, 92, 233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.014

Jones, B.C., Vukovic, J., Little, A.C., Roberts, S.C., DeBruine, L.M. (2011). Circum-menopausal changes in women’s preferences for sexually dimorphic shape cues in peer-aged faces. Biological Psychology, 87, 453-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.04.004

Judge, T.A., Hurst, C., Simon, L.S. (2009). Does it pay to be smart, attractive, or confident (or all three)? Relationships among general mental ability, physical attractiveness, core selfevaluations, and income. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 742-755. https://psycnet.apa.

org/doi/10.1037/a0015497

Kampe, K.K.W., Frith, C.D., Frith, U. (2003). “Hey John”: signals conveying communicative intention toward the self-activate brain regions associated with “mentalizing,” regardless of modality. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23(12), 5258-5263. https://doi.org/10.1523/

jneurosci.23-12-05258.2003

Kent, S.E., Reid, A.P., Kairn, E.R., Brain, D.J. (1988). Neonatal septal deviations. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 81(3), 132-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107688808100305

Kobayashi, H., Kohshima, S. (2001). Unique morphology of the human eye and its adaptive meaning: comparative studies on external morphology of the primate eye. Journal of Human Evolution, 40, 419-435. https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.2001.0468

Komori, M., Kawamura, S., Ishihara, S. (2009). Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness. Vision Research, 49, 862-869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.005

Kościński, K. (2007). Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropological Review, 70, 45-79. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10044-008-0001-9

Kościński, K. (2013). Perception of facial attractiveness from static and dynamic stimuli. Perception, 42, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7378

Langlois, J.H., Roggman, L.A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2), 115-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00079.x

Lee, A.J., Zietsch, B.P. (2015). Women’s pathogen disgust predicting preference for facial masculinity may be specific to age and study design. Evolution & Human Behavior, 36, 249-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.12.001

Lewis, M.B. (2017). Fertility affects asymmetry detection not symmetry preference in assessments of 3D facial attractiveness. Cognition 166, 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.034

Lieberman, D.E. (2011). The evolution of the human head. Harvard University Press.

Little, A.C. (2014). Domain specificity in human symmetry preferences: symmetry is most pleasant when looking at human faces. Symmetry, 6, 222-233. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym6020222

Little, A.C., Burriss, R.P., Petrie, M., Jones, B.C., Roberts, S.C. (2013). Oral contraceptive use in women changes preferences for male facial masculinity and is associated with partner facial masculinity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 1777-1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

psyneuen.2013.02.014

Little, A.C., Jones, B.C. (2003). Evidence against perceptual bias views for symmetry preferences in human faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 270, 1759-1763. https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frspb.2003.2445

Little, A.C., Jones, B.C. (2006). Attraction independent of detection suggests special mechanisms for symmetry preferences in human face perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences, 273, 3093-3099. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3679

Little, A.C., Jones, B.C., Burt, D.M., Perrett, D I. (2007). Preferences for symmetry in faces change across the menstrual cycle. Biological Psychology, 76(3), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.08.003

Little, A.C., Saxton, T.K., Roberts, S.C., Jones, B.C., DeBruine, L.M., Vukovic, J., Perrett, D.I., Feinberg, D.R., Chenore, T. (2010). Women’s preferences for masculinity in male faces are highest during reproductive age range and lower around puberty and post-menopause. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 912-920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.12.006

Ma, D.S., Kantner, J., Wittenbrink, B. (2021). Chicago Face Database: Multiracial expansion.Behavior Research Methods, 53, 1289-1300. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01482-5

McKone, E., Robbins, R. (2012). Are faces special? In G. Rhodes, A. Calder, M. Johnson & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), Oxford handbook of face perception. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.013.0009

Mogilski, J.K., Welling, L.L.M. (2017). The relative importance of sexual dimorphism, fluctuating asymmetry, and color cues to health during evaluation of potential partners’ facial photographs. A conjoint analysis study. Human Nature, 28, 53-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-016-9277-4

Möller, A.P. (1997). Developmental stability and fitness: A review. The American Naturalist, 149(5), 916-32. https://doi.org/10.1086/286030

Morris, D. (2009). El hombre desnudo. Editorial Planeta Colombia.

Neskey, D., Eloy, J.A., Casiano, R.R. (2009). Nasal, Septal, and Turbinate Anatomy and Embryology. Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 42, 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2009.01.008

Parada, C. (2009). Evolución y desarrollo facial: perspectiva molecular. Universitas Odontológica, 28(61), 75-85.

Pascalis, O., Kelly, D. J. (2009). The origins of face processing in humans: Phylogeny and ontogeny. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01119.x

Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I. (2000). Female preference for male faces changes cyclically. Further evidence. Evolution & Human Behavior, 21, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00033-1

Rhodes, G., Geddes, K., Jeffery, L., Dziurawiec, S., Clark, A. (2002). Are average and symmetric faces attractive to infants? Discrimination and looking preferences. Perception, 31, 315-321.https://doi.org/10.1068/p3129

Rhodes, G., Sumich, A., Byatt, G. (1999). Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry? Psychological Science, 10(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00106

Rhodes, G., Yoshikawa, S., Clark, A., Lee, K., McKay, R., Akamatsu, S. (2001). Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception, 30, 611-625. https://doi.org/10.1068/p3123

Roberts, S.C., Little, A.C., Gosling, L.M., Perrett, D.I., Carter, V., Jones, B.C., Penton-Voak, I., Petrie, M. (2005). MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 213-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.09.002

Roxbury, C., Ishii, M., Godoy, A., Papel, I., Byrne, P. J., Boahene, K.D.O., Ishii, L.E. (2012).

Impact of crooked nose rhinoplasty on observer perceptions of attractiveness. Laryngoscope, 122, 773-778. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23191

Sadr, J., Jarudi, I., Sinha, P. (2003). The role of eyebrows in face recognition. Perception, 32, 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1068/p5027

Samal, A., Subramani, V., Marx, D.B. (2007). An analysis of sexual dimorphism in the human face. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 18, 453-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2007.04.010

Sheeran, M.J., Nachman, M.W. (2014). Morphological and population genomic evidence that human faces have evolved to signal individual identity. Nature Communications, 5(4800), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5800

Stephen, I.D., McKeegan, A.M. (2010). Lip color affects perceived sex typicality and attractiveness of human faces. Perception, 39, 1104-1110. https://doi.org/10.1068/p6730

Strohminger, N., Gray, K., Chituc, V., Heffner, J., Schein, C., Heagins, T.B. (2016). The MR2: A multi-racial mega-resolution database of facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1197-1204. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0641-9

Sugiyama, L.S. (2016). Physical attractiveness: An adaptationist perspective. En D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology. Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 317-385). Wiley.

Švegar, D. (2016). What does facial symmetry reveal about health and personality? Polish Psychological Bulletin, 47(3), 356-365. https://doi.org/10.1515/ppb-2016-0042

Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S.W. (1993). Human facial beauty: Averageness, symmetry and parasite resistance. Human Nature, 4, 237-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02692201

Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S.W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 452-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01403-5

Thornhill, R., Gangestad, S.W. (2006). Facial sexual dimorphism, developmental stability, and susceptibility to disease in men and women. Evolution and Human Behavior 27, 131-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.06.001

Thornhill, R., Moller, A.P. (1997). Developmental stability, disease and medicine. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 72(4), 497-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0006323197005082

Tiddeman, B., Burt, D.M., Perrett, D.I. (2001). Computer graphics in facial perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(5), 42-50.

Tipples, J., Atkinson, A.P., Young, A. W. (2002). The eyebrow frown: a salient social signal. Emotion, 2(3), 288-296. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.3.288

Tomkins, J., Kotiaho, J. (2001). Fluctuating Asymmetry. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1038/npg.els.0003741

Van Dogen, S., Gangestad, S.W. (2011). Human fluctuating asymmetry in relation to health and quality: a meta-analysis. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32, 380-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.03.002

Vingilis-Jaremko, L., Maurer, D. (2013). The influence of averageness on children’s judgments of facial attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 624-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2013.10.006

Watkins, L.M., Johnston, L. (2000). Screening job applicants: The impact of physical attractiveness and application quality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(2), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00135

Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection: A selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 53, 205-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3

Zebrowitz, L.A. (2017). First impressions from faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(3), 237-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416683996

Zebrowitz L.A., Rhodes G. (2004). Sensitivity to “bad genes” and the anomalous face overgeneralization effect: cue validity, cue utilization, and accuracy in judging intelligence and health. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28(3), 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1023/

B:JONB.0000039648.30935.1b

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales