How to Cite
Downloads
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Favio González, EUMAEUS (LEPIDOPTERA: LYCAENIDAE) HERBIVORY ON AN ENDEMIC COLOMBIA GYMNOSPERM , Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales: Vol. 28 No. 107 (2004)
- María Angélica Bello, Hamleth Valois-Cuesta, Favio González, ARISTOLOCHIA GRANDIFLORA SW. (ARISTOLOCHIACEAE): DEVELOPMENT AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE WORLD'S LONGEST FLOWER , Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales: Vol. 30 No. 115 (2006)
- Favio González, Héctor Eduardo Esquivel, Gloria Andrea Murcia, Natalia Pabón-Mora, ARISTOLOCHIA PENTANDRA (ARISTOLOCHIACEAE) IN COLOMBIA: BIOGEOGRAPHIC IMPLICATIONS AND PROPOSED SYNAPOMORPHIES BETWEEN THE PENTANDROUS SPECIES OF ARISTOLOCHIA AND ITS SOUTH AMERICAN SISTER GROUP , Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales: Vol. 34 No. 133 (2010)
- María Eugenia Morales, Favio González, REDISCOVERY OF CHALYBEA NAUDIN AND ITS IMPLICATIONS IN THE GENERIC LIMITS OF HUI/AEA WURDACK (MELASTOMATACEAE , Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales: Vol. 29 No. 111 (2005)
Métricas Alternativas
Dimensions
Abstract
The recently published monograph of Aristolochiaceae for the Flora of Paraguay revives the traditional delimitation of Aristolochia with respect to the monotypic genera Euglypha y Holostylis. The presence of both morphological and molecular synapomorphies of Aristolochia in Euglypha and Holostylis, as well as the reevaluation of the diagnostic and differential traits of Euglypha and Holostylis, which are shown to be ambiguous, homoplasic, clinal or present only in late floral semaphoronts, provide conclusive evidence to subordinate E. rojasiana y H. reniformis in Aristolochia. The reconognition of Aristolochia, such as that followed in the mentioned monograph, implies the paraphyly of this taxon, which stands against the logic principles of the phylogenetic systematics. The morphological and molecular-based phylogenetic analyses of the Aristolochiaceae, which provide sufficient evidence to merge Euglypha and Holostylis within Aristolochia, as the first two are nested in the clade formed by the subgenera Aristolochia + Pararistolochia, and more precisely within the New World subgenus Aristolochia sect. Gymnolobus.
Keywords
References
Ahumada, l. Z. 1967. Revision de las Aristolochiaceae argentinas. Op. Lill. 16: 1-148.
gonzález f .- florística y sistemática filogenética innecesariamente disyuntas : el caso de aristolochia , euglypha y holostylis 201
gonzález f. 2010. Aristolochiaceae. In: L. Ramella & P. Perret (eds.), Flora del Paraguay 41: 1-74. Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques, Ville de Genève, Suiza.
Baldacci, A. 1894. Affinita delle Aristolochiacee e dei generi Aristolochiacei. Boll. Soc. Bot. Ital. 1894: 49-54.
Brummitt, r. K. 2003. Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa. Taxon 52: 803-804.
Brummitt, r. K. 2006. Am I a bony fish? Taxon 55: 268-269.
Brummitt, r. K. 2008. Evolution in taxonomic perspective. Taxon 57: 1049-1050.
Brummitt, r. K. & M. s. M. sosef. 1998. Paraphyletic taxa are inherent in Linnaean classification – A reply to Freudenstein. Taxon 47: 411-412.
Chodat, r. & e. Hassler. 1906. Novitates Paraguarienses. Bull. Herb. Boiss., ser. 2, 6: 138-141.
Dias, P., l. C. s. Assis & r. G. Udulutsch. 2005. Monophyly vs. paraphyly in plant systematics. Taxon 54: 1039-1040.
Duchartre, P. 1854. Tentamen methodicae divisionis generis Aristolochia. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. ser. 4, 2: 29-76.
Duchartre, P. 1864. Aristolochiaceae. In: A. P. de Candolle (ed.), Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis. Paris, 15(1): 421-498.
Ebach, M. C., d. M. williams & J. J. Morrone. 2006. Paraphyly is bad taxonomy. Taxon 55: 831-832.
González, f. 1990. Aristolochiaceae. Flora de Colombia. Monografía No. 12. Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, 184 pp.
González, f. 1994. Aristolochiaceae. Flora of Ecuador. Monograph No. 51. Council for Nordic Publications in Botany, Copenhagen, Denmark.
González, f. 1997. Hacia una filogenia de Aristolochia y sus congéneres neotropicales. Caldasia 19 (1-2): 93-108.
González, f. 1999a. A phylogenetic analysis of the Aristolochioideae (Aristolochiaceae). Ph D. Dissertation. City University of New York, New York.
González, f. 1999b. Un nuevo nombre para Holostylis reniformis (Aristolochiaceae). Rev. Acad. Colomb. Ci. Exact. 23 (88): 337-339.
González, f & d. w. stevenson. 2000a. Gynostemium development in Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122: 249-291.
González, f & d. w. stevenson. 2000b. Perianth development and systematics of Aristolochia. Flora 195: 370-391.
González, f & d. w. stevenson. 2002. A phylogenetic analysis of the subfamily Aristolochioideae (Aristolochiaceae). Rev. Acad. Colomb. Ci. Exact. 26 (98):25-60.
González, f., C. Neinhuis & s. wanke. 2005. Phylogenetic relationships of Aristolochiaceae subfamily Aristolochioideae based on molecular and morphological data. Abstracts, XVII International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, p. 202.
González, f., s. wagner, l. symmank, K. salomo, M. s. samain, s. isnard, N. rowe, C. Neinhuis & s. wanke. 2012. Multiple vicariance events explain complex trans-Pacific disjunct lineages within Aristolochia subgenus Isotrema (Aristolochiaceae). J. Biogeogr. (submitted).
Hauman, l. 1923. Les Aristolochiacées de L’Argentine ét de L’Uruguay. An. Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. Buenos Aires 32: 315-338.
Hennig, w. 1982. Phylogenetische Systematik. Verlag Paul Parey, Berlin. Hoehne, f. C. 1927. Monographia illustrada das aristolochiaceas brasileiras. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 20(1): 67-175, t. 16-103.
Hennig, w. 1942. Aristolochiaceas. Fl. Brasílica 15(2): 3-141, t. 1-123.
Hörandl, e. 2006. Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa – Evolutionary versus cladistic classifications. Taxon 55: 564-570.
Hörandl, e. 2007. Neglecting evolution is bad taxonomy. Taxon 55: 1-5.
Hörandl, e. 2010. Beyond cladistics: Extending evolutionary classifications intodeeper time levels. Taxon 59: 345-350.
Hosseus, C. C. 1921. Estudios comparativos sobre la vegetación de las provincias de La Rioja y de San Juan. Bol. Acad. Nac. Cienc. Córdoba, Argentina 26: 43.
Huber, H. 1960. Zur Abgrenzung der Gattung Aristolochia L. Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. München 3: 531-553.
Huber, H. 1960. 1985. Samenmerkmale und Gliederung der Aristolochiaceen. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 107: 277-320.
Huber, H. 1993. Aristolochiaceae. In: K. Kubitzki (ed.), The families and genera of vascular plants, 2: 129-137. Springer, Berlin.
Kelly, l. M. & f. González. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in Aristolochiaceae. Syst. Bot. 28: 236-249.
Kubitzki, K. 2000. Plant systematics at the end of a century. Pp. 65-74 in B. Nordenstam, G. El-Ghazaly & M. Kassas (eds.), Plant Systematics for the 21th Century. Wenner-Gren International Series, Vol. 77. Portland Press, London.
Masters, M. t. 1875. Aristolochiaceae. In: C. F. P. von Martius (ed.), Flora Brasiliensis 4(2): 76-114, t. 17-26. Frid. Fleischer, Leipzig.
Murata, J., t. ohi-toma, s. wu, d. darnaedi, t. sugawara, t. Nakanishi & H. Murata. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae) inferred from matK sequences. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 52: 75-83.
Nordal, i. & B. stedje. 2005. paraphyletic taxa should be accepted. Taxon 54:5-6.
Ohi-toma, t., t. sugawara, H. Murata, s. wanke, C. Neinhuis & J. Murata. 2006. Molecular phylogeny of Aristolochia sensu lato (Aristolochiaceae) based on sequences of rbcL, matK, and phyA genes, with special reference to differentiation of chromosome numbers. Syst. Bot. 31: 481-492.
Pfeifer, H. wm. 1966. Revision of the North and Central American hexandrous species of Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 53: 115-196.
Pfeifer, H. wm. 1970. Two new hexandrous mexican Aristolochias. Univ. Connecticut Occas. Papers 1: 291-297.
Potter, d. & J. V. freudenstein. 2005. Character-based phylogenetic Linnaean classification: taxa should be both ranked and monophyletic. Taxon 54:1033-1035.
Ramella, l., P. Perret & l. Z. Ahumada. 2010. Sinónimos nuevos y tipificaciones en la familia Aristolochiaceae de la Flora del Paraguay. Candollea 65:113-116.
Schmidt, o. C. 1935 . Aristolochiaceae. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien. Ed. 2, 16b: 204-242.
Schuh, r. t. 2003. The Linnaean system and its 250-year persistence. Bot. Rev. 69: 59-78.
Sosef, M. s. M. 1997. Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46: 75-85.
Toursarkissian, M. 1973. Las Aristoloquiáceas chaqueñas. Notas Preliminares para la Flora Chaqueña. Secretaría de Agricultura y Gan. de la Nación 5:14-29.
Van wyk, A. e. 2007. The end justifies the means. Taxon 56:645-648.
Wanke, s., f. González & C. Neinhuis. 2006. Systematics of pipevines: Combining morphological and fast-evolving molecular characters to investigate the relationships within subfamily Aristolochioideae (Aristolochiaceae). Int. J. Pl. Sci. 167: 1215-1227.
Williams, d. M., M. C. ebach & Q. wheeler. 2005. 150 reasons for paraphyly: a response. Taxon 54:858.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales