Evaluation of a rapid method to determine lime requirements in acid soils of the Colombian coffee zone
PDF (Español (España))

Supplementary Files

Anexo 1 (Español (España))
Anexo 2 (Español (España))

How to Cite

Díaz-Poveda, V. C. ., & Sadeghian, S. (2021). Evaluation of a rapid method to determine lime requirements in acid soils of the Colombian coffee zone. Revista De La Academia Colombiana De Ciencias Exactas, Físicas Y Naturales, 45(177), 1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1405

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Métricas Alternativas


Dimensions

Abstract

Determining the lime requirements (LR) for acidic soils requires practical, fast, and effective methods. Some of the options currently used underestimate these requirements while others lead to overestimations. Here we evaluated the direct titration methodology with calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2) as a faster alternative to the incubation method, which was used as a standard. We used 25 samples from the Colombian coffee zone with pH<5.5 and contrasting physicochemical properties. We treated them with increasing doses of dolomite (CaCO3.MgCO3) in the incubation method and with Ca(OH)2 0.02 M in the titration method. The increase in pH in response to the treatments in the incubation method was exponential and less than that obtained with the titration method. In all soils, the titration method showed a linear trend and underestimated the lime requirements to reach a pH=5.5 compared to theincubation method. A multiple regression analysis (R2=0.94**) was used to explain the differences in lime requirements between the two methods based on several properties of the soils and generate the correction factor that should be added to the dose determined by the titration method. The soil properties considered in the  regression analysis were the organic matter, N, P, K,Mg, S, Al, Na, Mn, Cu, B, and silt contents. We concluded that although the titration method with Ca(OH)2 is faster than the incubation method to determine the LR, its application in the Colombian coffee zone requires an adjustment factor based on the properties of the soil.

https://doi.org/10.18257/raccefyn.1405

Keywords

Soil acidity | Liming | Incubation | pH | Titration-Ca(OH)2
PDF (Español (España))

References

Adams, F. & Evans, C.E. (1962). A rapid method for measuring lime requirement of red-yellow podzolic soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings. 26: 355-357.

Aitken, R. L., Moody, P. W., McKinley, P. G. (1990). Lime requirement of acidic Queensland soils. II. Comparison of laboratory methods for predicting lime requirement. Soil research. 28 (5):703-715.

Alabi, K. E., Sorensen, R. C., Knudsen, D., Rehm, G. W. (1986). Comparison of several lime requirement methods on coarse‐textured soils of Northeastern Nebraska. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 50 (4): 937-941.

Alatas, J., Tsadilas, C.D., Sgouras, J. (2005). Comparison of two methods of lime requirement determination. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 36 (1-3): 183-190. Doi: 10.1081/CSS-200043028

Alley, M.M. & Zelazny, L.W. (1987). Soil acidity: Soil pH and lime needs. En: Brown, J.R., Soil Testing: Sampling, Correlation, Calibration, and Interpretation, Volume 21, pp. 65-72. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Doi: 10.2136/sssaspecpub21.c7

Álvarez, V.H. & Ribeiro, A.C. (1999). Calagem. En: Ribeiro, A. C.; Guimarães, P. T. G.; Álvarez V., V. H. (Ed.). Recomendação para o uso de corretivos e fertilizantes em Minas Gerais: 5a.

Aproximação. Viçosa: Comissão de Fertilidade do Solo do Estado de Minas Gerais, 43-60.

Baker, A.S. & Chae, Y.M. (1977). A laboratory quick test for predicting lime requirement of acid mineral soils. Tech. Bull. 88. Washington Agric. Exp. Stn. Pullman. 1-11.

Bailey, J.S., Stevens, D.J., Kilpatrick, J. (1989). A rapid method for predicting the lime requirement of acidic temperate soils with widely varying organic matter contents. III. A lime-quality correction model. Journal of Soil Science. 40: 831-847.

Cabrales H., E. M, Velázquez H., C. M., Ayala C., J. (2018). Determinación de la curva de requerimientos de cal para un alfisol bajo condiciones de vivero. Doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14825.13921

Caires, E. (2010). Manejo da acidez do solo. En: L. I. Prochnow, V. Casarin, S. R. Stipp (Eds.), Boas práticas para uso eficiente de fertilizantes: Contexto mundial e práticas de suporte (Vol. 1, pp. 277-347). International Plant Nutrition Institute.

Carrillo, I. (1985). Manual de laboratorio de suelos. Chinchiná: Centro Nacional de Investigaciones de Café.

Castro, H. & Munévar, O. (2013). Mejoramiento químico de suelos ácidos mediante el uso combinado de materiales encalantes. Revista U.D.C.A Actualidad & Divulgación Científica. 16 (2): 409-416.

Castro, H., Gómez, M., Munévar, O., Hernández, D. (2006). Diagnóstico y control de la acidez en suelos sulfatados ácidos en el Distrito de riego del Alto Chicamocha (Boyacá) mediante pruebas de incubación. Agronomía Colombiana. 24 (1): 122-130.

Cochrane, T., Salinas, J., Sánchez, P. (1980). An equation for liming acid mineral soils to compensate crops aluminium tolerance. Tropical Agriculture. 57 (2): 133-140.

Curtin, D. & Trolove, S. (2013). Predicting pH buffering capacity of New Zealand soils from organic matter content and mineral characteristics. Soil Res. 51: 494-502. Doi: 10.1071/SR13137

Dunn, L. E. (1943). Lime-requirement determination of soils by means of titration curves. Soil Science. 56: 341-351.

Edmeades, D. C., Wheeler, D. M., Waller, J. E. (1985). Comparison of methods for determining lime requirements of New Zealand soils. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 28(1): 93-100.

Espinosa, J. & Molina, E. (1999). Acidez y encalado de los suelos. Inpofos. 1-5: 29-30.

Farhoodi, A. & Coventry, D.R. (2008). Field crop responses to lime in the mid-north region of South Australia. Field Crops Research. 108: 45-53.

Godsey, C. B., Pierzynski, G. M., Mengel, D. B., Lamond, R.E. (2007). Evaluation of common lime requirement methods. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71: 843-850. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj2006.0121

Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia, Instituto Geográfico Agustín Codazzi. (2017). Atlas cafetero de Colombia. Imprenta Nacional de Colombia. Bogotá, 65-254.

Havlin, J., Tisdale, S., Nelson, J., Beaton, J. (2017). Soil fertility and fertilizers, an introduction to nutrient management, (8th edition). Pearson Prentice Hall. 35, 68-71, 81.

Hochman, Z., Crocker, G.J., Dettman, E.B. (1995). Predicting lime-induced changes in soil-pH from exchangeable aluminum, soil-pH, total exchangeable cations and organic-carbon values measured on unlimed soils. Soil Res. 33: 31-41. Doi: 10.1071/SR9950031

Kamprath, E. J. (1970). Exchangeable aluminum as a criterion for liming leached mineral soils 1. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 34 (2): 252-254.

Kaplan, S. & Kemal G., E. (2018). Comparison of growth curves using non-linear regression function in Japanese quail. Journal of Applied Animal Research. 46 (1): 112-117. Doi: 10.1080/09712119.2016.1268965

Kissel, D. E., Isaac, R. A., Hitchcock, L. S., Sonon, L. S. Venderll, P. F. (2007). Implementation of soil lime requirement by a single-addition titration method. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 38: 1341-1352. Doi: 10.1080/00103620701328735

Liu, M., Kissel, D. E., Vendrel, P.F., Cabrera, M. L. (2004). Soil lime requirement by direct titration with calcium hydroxide. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68: 1228-1233. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.1228

Liu, M., Kissel, D. E., Cabrera, M.L., Vendrell, P. F. (2005). Soil lime requirement by direct titration with a single addition of calcium hydroxide. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 69: 522-530. Doi:10.2136/sssaj2004.1228

Magdoff, F.R. & Bartlett, R.J. (1985). Soil pH buffering revisited. Soil Sci.Soc. Am. Proc. 49: 145-148. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj1985.03615995004900010029x

McFarland, C.; Shiwakoti, S.; Carpenter-Boggs, L.; Schroeder, K.; Brown, T., Huggins, D. (2020). Evaluating buffer methods for determining lime requirement on acidified agricultural soils of the Palouse. Soil Science Society of American Journal. 84: 1769-1781.

McLean, E.O. (1982). Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties 2nd edition. Page AL ed., Am. Soc. Agronomy. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 199-224.

Mehlich, A. (1976). New buffer pH method for rapid estimation of exchangeable acidity and lime requirement of soils. Commun. in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 7 (7): 637-652. Doi: 10.1080/00103627609366673

Owusu‐Bennoah, E., Acquaye, D.K., Mahamah, T. (1995). Comparative study of selected lime requirement methods for some acid Ghanaian soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 26 (7-8): 937-950. Doi: 10.1080/00103629509369346

Pagani, A. & Mallarino, A. P. (2011). Comparison of methods to determine crop lime requierement under field conditions, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 76: 1855-1866. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj2011.0327

Quaggio, J.A., van Raij, B., Malavolta, E. (1985). Alternative use of the SMP‐buffer solution to determine lime requirement of soils. Commun Soil Sci Plan. 16: 245-60. Doi: 10.1080/00103628509367600

Raij, B. van. (1991). Fertilidade do solo e adubacao. Potafos, 343

Raij, B. van. (2011). Acidez e calagem. En: Fertilidade do solo e Manejo de nutrientes. IPNI. Piracicaba. 1-420.

Sadeghian, S. (2008). Fertilidad del suelo y nutrición del café en Colombia. Boletín Técnico Cenicafé. 32: 14-15.

Sadeghian, S. (2016). La acidez del suelo, una limitante común para la producción de café. Avances Técnicos Cenicafé, 466.

Sadeghian K., S.; Alárcón T., V. F., Díaz-Poveda, V.C., Lince S., L. A., Rey S., J.C. (2019). Fertilidad del suelo y manejo de la nutrición. En Federación Nacional de Cafeteros de Colombia (Ed.), Aplicación de ciencia, tecnología e innovación en el cultivo de café ajustado a las condiciones particulares del Huila, (pp. 80-105). Cenicafé.

Sadeghian K., S., Díaz-Marín, C. (2020). Corrección de la acidez del suelo: alteraciones químicas del suelo. Revista Cenicafé. 71 (1): 7-20. Doi: 10.38141/10778/1116

SAS Institute Inc. (2017). SAS, Cary, North Carolina, USA.

Shoemaker, H. E., McLean, E. O., Pratt, P. F. (1961). Buffer methods for determination of lime requirements of soils with appreciable amounts of exchangeable aluminum. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 25: 274-277.

Systat Software Inc. (2006). Sigma Plot 10.0, Systat Software Inc., CA, USA.

Sikora, F.J. (2006). A buffer that mimics the SMP buffer for determining lime requirement of soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70: 474-486. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0164

Sims, J.T. (1996). Lime requirement. En: Sparks, D.L., Page, A.L., Helmke, P.A., Loeppert, R.H., Soltanpour, P.N., Tabatabai, M.A., Johnston, C.T., Sumner, M.E., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods, 5.3, Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Doi: 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c17

Soil Science Society of America. (2008). Glossary of Soil Science Terms. Soil Science Society of America, Madison.

Sousa, D.M., Miranda, L.N., Oliveira, S.A. (2007). Acidez do solo e sua correção. En: Novais, R.F., Alvarez V., V.H., Barros, N.F., Fontes, R.L., Cantarutti, R.B., Neves, J.C., eds. Fertilidade do solo. Viçosa, MG, Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo. 206-274.

Ssali, H. & Nuwamanya, J. K. (1981). Buffer pH methods for estimation of lime requirement of tropical acid soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 12 (7): 643-659.

StatPoint Technologies. Inc. (2007). Statgraphics Centurion, X.V. Version 15.2.14; Software for Technical Computation. StatPoint Technologies. Inc., Warrenton, VA, USA.

Teixeira, W.G., Alvarez V., V.H., Lima, J.C. (2020). New methods for estimating lime requirement to attain desirable pH values in Brazilian soils. Rev Bras Cienc Solo. 44: e0200008. Doi:10.36783/18069657rbcs20200008

Thompson, J.S., Kissel, D.E., Cabrera, M.L., Sonon, L.S. (2010). Equilibration Reaction from Single Addition of Base to Determine Soil Lime Requirement. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 74 (2): 663-669. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj2009.0168

Tunney, H., Sikora, F. J., Kissel, D., Wolf, A., Sonon, L., Goulding, K. (2010). A comparison of lime requirements by five methods on grassland mineral soils in Ireland. Soil use and management. 26 (2): 126-132.

Viscarra R. & McBratney, A.B. (2001). A response-surface calibration model for rapid and versatile site-specific lime-requirement predictions in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Soil Research. 39 (1): 185-201. Doi: 10.1071/SR99131

Uchida, R. & Hue, N.V. (2000). Soil acidity and liming. En: Silva, J.A., Uchida, R. Plant Nutrient Management in Hawaii’s Soils, Approaches for Tropical and Subtropical Agriculture. College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa. p. 101-111.

Weaver, A.R., Kissel, D.E., Chen, F., West, L.T., Adkins, W., Rickman, D., Luvall, J.C. (2004). Mapping soil pH buffering capacity of selected fields in the Coastal. Plain. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 68: 662-668. Doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.6620

Woodruff, C.M. (1948). Testing Soils for Lime requirement by means of a buffered solution and the glass electrode. Soil Science. 66: 53-63.

Zapata, R. (2004). Química de la acidez del suelo. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. p. 43-55.

Zapata, R. (2014). Los procesos químicos del suelo. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. p. 440-449.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales